Szelethus updated this revision to Diff 159486.
Szelethus added a comment.

Added the TODO we were discussing.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D49438

Files:
  lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/UninitializedObjectChecker.cpp
  test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-inheritance.cpp
  test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-no-dereference.cpp
  test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-notes-as-warnings.cpp
  test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-ptr-ref.cpp
  test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object.cpp

Index: test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object.cpp
+++ test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object.cpp
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:Pedantic=true -std=c++11 -DPEDANTIC -verify %s
-
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject -std=c++11 -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:Pedantic=true -DPEDANTIC \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:CheckPointeeInitialization=true \
+// RUN:   -std=c++11 -verify  %s
+
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:CheckPointeeInitialization=true \
+// RUN:   -std=c++11 -verify  %s
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 // Default constructor test.
Index: test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-ptr-ref.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-ptr-ref.cpp
+++ test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-ptr-ref.cpp
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:Pedantic=true -std=c++11 -DPEDANTIC -verify %s
-
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject -std=c++11 -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:Pedantic=true -DPEDANTIC \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:CheckPointeeInitialization=true \
+// RUN:   -std=c++11 -verify  %s
+
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:CheckPointeeInitialization=true \
+// RUN:   -std=c++11 -verify  %s
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 // Concrete location tests.
Index: test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-notes-as-warnings.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-notes-as-warnings.cpp
+++ test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-notes-as-warnings.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:NotesAsWarnings=true -std=c++11 -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:NotesAsWarnings=true \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:CheckPointeeInitialization=true \
+// RUN:   -std=c++11 -verify %s
 
 class NotesAsWarningsTest {
   int a;
Index: test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-no-dereference.cpp
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-no-dereference.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject \
+// RUN:   -std=c++11 -DPEDANTIC -verify %s
+
+class UninitPointerTest {
+  int *ptr; // expected-note{{uninitialized pointer 'this->ptr'}}
+  int dontGetFilteredByNonPedanticMode = 0;
+
+public:
+  UninitPointerTest() {} // expected-warning{{1 uninitialized field}}
+};
+
+void fUninitPointerTest() {
+  UninitPointerTest();
+}
+
+class UninitPointeeTest {
+  int *ptr; // no-note
+  int dontGetFilteredByNonPedanticMode = 0;
+
+public:
+  UninitPointeeTest(int *ptr) : ptr(ptr) {} // no-warning
+};
+
+void fUninitPointeeTest() {
+  int a;
+  UninitPointeeTest t(&a);
+}
Index: test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-inheritance.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-inheritance.cpp
+++ test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-inheritance.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:Pedantic=true -std=c++11 -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject \
+// RUN: -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:Pedantic=true -DPEDANTIC \
+// RUN: -analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:CheckPointeeInitialization=true \
+// RUN: -std=c++11 -verify  %s
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 // Non-polymorphic inheritance tests
Index: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/UninitializedObjectChecker.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/UninitializedObjectChecker.cpp
+++ lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/UninitializedObjectChecker.cpp
@@ -10,19 +10,33 @@
 // This file defines a checker that reports uninitialized fields in objects
 // created after a constructor call.
 //
-// This checker has two options:
+// This checker has several options:
 //   - "Pedantic" (boolean). If its not set or is set to false, the checker
 //     won't emit warnings for objects that don't have at least one initialized
 //     field. This may be set with
 //
-//  `-analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:Pedantic=true`.
+//     `-analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:Pedantic=true`.
 //
 //   - "NotesAsWarnings" (boolean). If set to true, the checker will emit a
 //     warning for each uninitalized field, as opposed to emitting one warning
 //     per constructor call, and listing the uninitialized fields that belongs
 //     to it in notes. Defaults to false.
 //
-//  `-analyzer-config alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:NotesAsWarnings=true`.
+//     `-analyzer-config \
+//         alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:NotesAsWarnings=true`.
+//
+//   - "CheckPointeeInitialization" (boolean). If set to false, the checker will
+//     not analyze the pointee of pointer/reference fields, and will only check
+//     whether the object itself is initialized. Defaults to false.
+//
+//     `-analyzer-config \
+//         alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:CheckPointeeInitialization=true`.
+//
+//     TODO: With some clever heuristics, some pointers should be dereferenced
+//     by default. For example, if the pointee is constructed within the
+//     constructor call, it's reasonable to say that no external object
+//     references it, and we wouldn't generate multiple report on the same
+//     pointee.
 //
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
@@ -44,6 +58,7 @@
   // These fields will be initialized when registering the checker.
   bool IsPedantic;
   bool ShouldConvertNotesToWarnings;
+  bool CheckPointeeInitialization;
 
   UninitializedObjectChecker()
       : BT_uninitField(new BuiltinBug(this, "Uninitialized fields")) {}
@@ -109,13 +124,16 @@
   const TypedValueRegion *const ObjectR;
 
   const bool IsPedantic;
+  const bool CheckPointeeInitialization;
+
   bool IsAnyFieldInitialized = false;
 
   UninitFieldSet UninitFields;
 
 public:
   FindUninitializedFields(ProgramStateRef State,
-                          const TypedValueRegion *const R, bool IsPedantic);
+                          const TypedValueRegion *const R, bool IsPedantic,
+                          bool CheckPointeeInitialization);
   const UninitFieldSet &getUninitFields();
 
 private:
@@ -261,8 +279,8 @@
   if (!Object)
     return;
 
-  FindUninitializedFields F(Context.getState(), Object->getRegion(),
-                            IsPedantic);
+  FindUninitializedFields F(Context.getState(), Object->getRegion(), IsPedantic,
+                            CheckPointeeInitialization);
 
   const UninitFieldSet &UninitFields = F.getUninitFields();
 
@@ -326,8 +344,10 @@
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
 FindUninitializedFields::FindUninitializedFields(
-    ProgramStateRef State, const TypedValueRegion *const R, bool IsPedantic)
-    : State(State), ObjectR(R), IsPedantic(IsPedantic) {}
+    ProgramStateRef State, const TypedValueRegion *const R, bool IsPedantic,
+    bool CheckPointeeInitialization)
+    : State(State), ObjectR(R), IsPedantic(IsPedantic),
+      CheckPointeeInitialization(CheckPointeeInitialization) {}
 
 const UninitFieldSet &FindUninitializedFields::getUninitFields() {
   isNonUnionUninit(ObjectR, FieldChainInfo());
@@ -474,6 +494,11 @@
     return addFieldToUninits({LocalChain, FR});
   }
 
+  if (!CheckPointeeInitialization) {
+    IsAnyFieldInitialized = true;
+    return false;
+  }
+
   const FieldDecl *FD = FR->getDecl();
 
   // TODO: The dynamic type of a void pointer may be retrieved with
@@ -700,4 +725,6 @@
       "Pedantic", /*DefaultVal*/ false, Chk);
   Chk->ShouldConvertNotesToWarnings = Mgr.getAnalyzerOptions().getBooleanOption(
       "NotesAsWarnings", /*DefaultVal*/ false, Chk);
+  Chk->CheckPointeeInitialization = Mgr.getAnalyzerOptions().getBooleanOption(
+      "CheckPointeeInitialization", /*DefaultVal*/ false, Chk);
 }
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to