bcraig added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/Analysis/padding_cpp.cpp:204-212
+// expected-warning@+1{{Excessive padding in 'struct FakeIntSandwich'}}
+struct FakeIntSandwich {
+ char c1;
+ int i;
+ char c2;
+};
+
----------------
Looking at this again... what new cases does this catch? FakeIntSandwich was
caught before (it is identical to 'PaddedA', and AnotherIntSandwich generated
no warning before. So what is different?
EBO1 and EBO2 are cases above that would be nice to catch, but aren't being
caught right now.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53206
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
