george.karpenkov added a comment. OK, so the overall direction makes sense: unregistered options are restricted to checkers, and for others, an explicit getter must be maintained. (though I would also prefer if even checkers could pre-register their options somehow)
@NoQ does this make sense to you? ================ Comment at: include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/AnalyzerOptions.h:243 + /// specified. + StringRef getStringOption(StringRef Name, StringRef DefaultVal); ---------------- xazax.hun wrote: > If you want the devs to maintain an explicit getter for each analyzer option > rather than making this one public at some point, please document expectation > this somewhere. +1 Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D53483 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
