sammccall added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53922#1281902, @krytarowski wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53922#1281898, @sammccall wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53922#1281882, @krytarowski wrote: > > > > > For NetBSD: > > > > > > - `ThreadPriority::Low` select either `SCHED_RR` or `SCHED_FIFO`, call > > > sched_get_priority_min() and set pthread_setschedparam(). > > > > > > https://www.netbsd.org/docs/internals/en/chap-processes.htm indicates > > `SCHED_RR` and `SCHED_FIFO` are real-time priorities on NetBSD, as they are > > on linux. > > i.e. higher priority than normal threads, regardless of priority value. > > > Priority level for SCHED_OTHER cannot be changed (it is dynamic), so the > applied patch is fine. Thanks. I was replying to your suggestion for NetBSD though - my reading of the docs says your "low" suggestion would end up being a very high priority. Is this not the case? Can you suggest a better reference for how BSD scheduling works? Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D53922 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
