krytarowski added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53922#1281914, @sammccall wrote:
> Thanks. I was replying to your suggestion for NetBSD though - my reading of > the docs says your "low" suggestion would end up being a very high priority. > Is this not the case? Can you suggest a better reference for how BSD > scheduling works? This reference is fine and the patch restricting it to Linux is fine. I think that there is no way to implement it for NetBSD, also it does not seem to be a crucial feature. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D53922 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
