echristo added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53919#1282994, @hjl.tools wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53919#1282952, @efriedma wrote:
>
> > With both 3.3 and trunk (I don't have a 7.0 handy; I can build it if it 
> > would be helpful):
>
>
> Please try clang 2.6 on both testcases.


From the releases:

23 Oct 2009     2.6

... why would you care about a 9 year old version of clang?


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D53919



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to