hjl.tools added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53919#1287510, @echristo wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53919#1282994, @hjl.tools wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53919#1282952, @efriedma wrote: > > > > > With both 3.3 and trunk (I don't have a 7.0 handy; I can build it if it > > > would be helpful): > > > > > > Please try clang 2.6 on both testcases. > > > From the releases: > > 23 Oct 2009 2.6 > > ... why would you care about a 9 year old version of clang? It is about ABI consistency. When AVX isn't enabled, the old and compilers should use the same calling convention. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D53919 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
