rnk added a comment. In D55672#1330402 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55672#1330402>, @rnk wrote:
> - a specialization of a function template that happens to be declared with > this calling convention (this also probably shouldn't include the CC in the > mangling, but it's okay to match GCC if it does) I didn't add a test for this special case, since we don't mangle ccs into normal functions. I don't think making a function specialization template is likely to cause us to suddenly emit the convention. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55672/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55672 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
