rjmccall added a comment. Thanks. I think you missed these, though:
- a template argument that's just a function type, not a function pointer or reference type - a specialization of a function template that happens to be declared with this calling convention (this also probably shouldn't include the CC in the mangling, but it's okay to match GCC if it does) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55672/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55672 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
