dblaikie added inline comments.
================ Comment at: test/AST/ast-dump-decl.m:90 // CHECK-NEXT: -ObjCProtocol {{.+}} 'P' +// CHECK-NEXT: -ObjCTypeParamDecl {{.+}} <col:33> col:33 T 'id':'id' ---------------- steveire wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > It seems strange to me to print out the type parameter after the superclass > > information given the source order. My understanding of the AST dumping > > order is that we try to keep the order of nodes in source order whenever > > possible. > That is not really a possible thing to try to do, because the AST dump > doesn't relate to a single language. It should be seen as language > independent. > > The principle I'm follow is that nodes dump themselves in entirety before > starting to dump their child nodes. That is a principle already followed by > most nodes. Changing this seems to be low cost, low impact and high benefit > to the code. >That is not really a possible thing to try to do, because the AST dump doesn't >relate to a single language. It should be seen as language independent. Is this particular aspect different between the different source languages Clang supports? (could you give examples?) Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55394/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55394 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits