aheejin marked 4 inline comments as done. aheejin added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lib/Driver/ToolChains/WebAssembly.cpp:29 + Pthread = + DriverArgs.hasFlag(options::OPT_pthread, options::OPT_no_pthread, false); + ThreadModel = ---------------- tlively wrote: > Shouldn't every use of `hasFlag` be `getLastArgValue` instead? `hasFlag` is a convenient way to check everything with one function call. with `getLastArgValue` we have to call it twice (for example, for `-pthread` and for `-no-pthread`), and most importantly when both of them are given, calling `getLastArgValue` doesn't give you information on which one is the last. `hasFlag` takes care of that by taking the last one when both of them are given. So `-pthread -no-pthread` will return false, and `-no-pthread -pthread` will return true. The reason I used `hasArg` below is just to check if the user gave it explicitly or not. And that's the reason I named variables `Pthread` and `HasPthread`. ================ Comment at: lib/Driver/ToolChains/WebAssembly.cpp:36 + // Did user explicitly specify -mthread-model / -pthread? + bool HasThreadModel = DriverArgs.hasArg(options::OPT_mthread_model); + bool HasPthread = Pthread && DriverArgs.hasArg(options::OPT_pthread); ---------------- tlively wrote: > It doesn't matter whether the user included the -pthread flag if they later > included the -no-pthread flag. This `HasThreadModel` is only used with `HasPthread` below. ``` if (HasPthread && HasThreadModel && ThreadModel != "posix") ``` So this is just to check if this thread model value came from the default value or the user explicitly gave it. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57874/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57874 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list email@example.com https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits