MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
In D59309#1428799 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59309#1428799>, @klimek wrote:
> Why did the numeric constant break this? Which path would the function run
> through?
as its looking though the parameter list is doesn't recognize a numeric
constant as being a valid thing it would see in an argument list and so falls
through the bottom to return false, it will only be where there is a
numeric_constant as the first argument, if it has a second argument and that
argument is just a simple type it would still fail, but switch them around and
it won't
As I look more at this, even this would fail to break
int TestFn(A=1)
{
return a;
}
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59309/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59309
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
