riccibruno added a comment. In D59214#1429400 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214#1429400>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> In D59214#1429384 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214#1429384>, @riccibruno > wrote: > > > IIRC, last time I looked only 4 statement/expression classes currently have > > some abbreviation defined. > > > Yep, that is what i'm seeing in this diff. > > In D59214#1429384 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214#1429384>, @riccibruno > wrote: > > > It would probably be useful to have someone go systematically through the > > list of classes and fix this. > > > Yeah, i suspect that might be **really** beneficial. Especially given that more people are going to use modules now that they are in the process of being standardized. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits