riccibruno added a comment.

In D59214#1429400 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214#1429400>, @lebedev.ri wrote:

> In D59214#1429384 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214#1429384>, @riccibruno 
> wrote:
>
> > IIRC, last time I looked only 4 statement/expression classes currently have 
> > some abbreviation defined.
>
>
> Yep, that is what i'm seeing in this diff.
>
> In D59214#1429384 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214#1429384>, @riccibruno 
> wrote:
>
> > It would probably be useful to have someone go systematically through the 
> > list of classes and fix this.
>
>
> Yeah, i suspect that might be **really** beneficial.


Especially given that more people are going to use modules now that they are in 
the process of being standardized.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to