lebedev.ri added a comment. In D59214#1429422 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214#1429422>, @riccibruno wrote:
> In D59214#1429400 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214#1429400>, @lebedev.ri > wrote: > > > In D59214#1429384 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214#1429384>, @riccibruno > > wrote: > > > > > IIRC, last time I looked only 4 statement/expression classes currently > > > have some abbreviation defined. > > > > > > Yep, that is what i'm seeing in this diff. > > > > In D59214#1429384 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214#1429384>, @riccibruno > > wrote: > > > > > It would probably be useful to have someone go systematically through the > > > list of classes and fix this. > > > > > > Yeah, i suspect that might be **really** beneficial. > > > Especially given that more people are going to use modules now that they are > in the process of being standardized. Ah, good point, filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41072 Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
