MyDeveloperDay added a comment.

Just a passing comment, Is this:

a) a different type of check that would be used for a different type of check 
than previous clang-tidy checks
b) or is this a replacement on the previous style?

Is there any documentation about the benefits of this method vs the old method? 
or of why we would potentially use one and not the other?

Is there a change needed to add_new_check.py to have it generate this new 
style? (its ok if the answer is yes in a future revision)

Do you foresee people using this mechanism going foward?

I do like the brevity of it and I do like the GTEST unit tests, (I struggled 
more with the lit tests than anything else, mainly for python on cygwin reasons)

It looks good, even if it looks like I need to go learn how tooling::stencil 
works... a little bit of documentation might not go a miss on how to get 
started with it...


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D61386/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D61386



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to