MyDeveloperDay added a comment. Just a passing comment, Is this:
a) a different type of check that would be used for a different type of check than previous clang-tidy checks b) or is this a replacement on the previous style? Is there any documentation about the benefits of this method vs the old method? or of why we would potentially use one and not the other? Is there a change needed to add_new_check.py to have it generate this new style? (its ok if the answer is yes in a future revision) Do you foresee people using this mechanism going foward? I do like the brevity of it and I do like the GTEST unit tests, (I struggled more with the lit tests than anything else, mainly for python on cygwin reasons) It looks good, even if it looks like I need to go learn how tooling::stencil works... a little bit of documentation might not go a miss on how to get started with it... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61386/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61386 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits