This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL259532: PR23057: Fix assertion `Val && "isa<> used on a null 
pointer"' on invalid for… (authored by dzobnin).

Changed prior to commit:
  http://reviews.llvm.org/D16630?vs=46131&id=46669#toc

Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D16630

Files:
  cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
  cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
  cfe/trunk/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.type/p3-0x.cpp
  cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-invalid-for-range.cpp

Index: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.type/p3-0x.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.type/p3-0x.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.type/p3-0x.cpp
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
   for (struct S { S(int) {} } s : arr) { // expected-error {{types may not be 
defined in a for range declaration}}
   }
 
+  for (struct S { S(int) {} } s : Undeclared); // expected-error{{types may 
not be defined in a for range declaration}}
+                                               // expected-error@-1{{use of 
undeclared identifier 'Undeclared'}}
+
   new struct T {}; // expected-error {{'T' cannot be defined in a type 
specifier}}
   new struct A {}; // expected-error {{'A' cannot be defined in a type 
specifier}}
 
Index: cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-invalid-for-range.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-invalid-for-range.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-invalid-for-range.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+// From PR23057 comment #18 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23057#c18).
+
+namespace N {
+  int X[10]; // expected-note{{declared here}}}}
+}
+
+void f1() {
+  for (auto operator new : X); // expected-error{{'operator new' cannot be the 
name of a variable or data member}}
+                               // expected-error@-1{{use of undeclared 
identifier 'X'; did you mean 'N::X'?}}
+}
+
+void f2() {
+  for (a operator== :) // expected-error{{'operator==' cannot be the name of a 
variable or data member}}
+                       // expected-error@-1{{expected expression}}
+                       // expected-error@-2{{unknown type name 'a'}}
+} // expected-error{{expected statement}}
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -9928,6 +9928,10 @@
 }
 
 void Sema::ActOnCXXForRangeDecl(Decl *D) {
+  // If there is no declaration, there was an error parsing it. Ignore it.
+  if (!D)
+    return;
+
   VarDecl *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(D);
   if (!VD) {
     Diag(D->getLocation(), diag::err_for_range_decl_must_be_var);
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
@@ -1716,9 +1716,11 @@
   StmtResult ForEachStmt;
 
   if (ForRange) {
+    ExprResult CorrectedRange =
+        Actions.CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr(ForRangeInit.RangeExpr.get());
     ForRangeStmt = Actions.ActOnCXXForRangeStmt(
         getCurScope(), ForLoc, CoawaitLoc, FirstPart.get(),
-        ForRangeInit.ColonLoc, ForRangeInit.RangeExpr.get(),
+        ForRangeInit.ColonLoc, CorrectedRange.get(),
         T.getCloseLocation(), Sema::BFRK_Build);
 
   // Similarly, we need to do the semantic analysis for a for-range


Index: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.type/p3-0x.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.type/p3-0x.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/dcl.spec/dcl.type/p3-0x.cpp
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
   for (struct S { S(int) {} } s : arr) { // expected-error {{types may not be defined in a for range declaration}}
   }
 
+  for (struct S { S(int) {} } s : Undeclared); // expected-error{{types may not be defined in a for range declaration}}
+                                               // expected-error@-1{{use of undeclared identifier 'Undeclared'}}
+
   new struct T {}; // expected-error {{'T' cannot be defined in a type specifier}}
   new struct A {}; // expected-error {{'A' cannot be defined in a type specifier}}
 
Index: cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-invalid-for-range.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-invalid-for-range.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-invalid-for-range.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+// From PR23057 comment #18 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23057#c18).
+
+namespace N {
+  int X[10]; // expected-note{{declared here}}}}
+}
+
+void f1() {
+  for (auto operator new : X); // expected-error{{'operator new' cannot be the name of a variable or data member}}
+                               // expected-error@-1{{use of undeclared identifier 'X'; did you mean 'N::X'?}}
+}
+
+void f2() {
+  for (a operator== :) // expected-error{{'operator==' cannot be the name of a variable or data member}}
+                       // expected-error@-1{{expected expression}}
+                       // expected-error@-2{{unknown type name 'a'}}
+} // expected-error{{expected statement}}
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -9928,6 +9928,10 @@
 }
 
 void Sema::ActOnCXXForRangeDecl(Decl *D) {
+  // If there is no declaration, there was an error parsing it. Ignore it.
+  if (!D)
+    return;
+
   VarDecl *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(D);
   if (!VD) {
     Diag(D->getLocation(), diag::err_for_range_decl_must_be_var);
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
@@ -1716,9 +1716,11 @@
   StmtResult ForEachStmt;
 
   if (ForRange) {
+    ExprResult CorrectedRange =
+        Actions.CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr(ForRangeInit.RangeExpr.get());
     ForRangeStmt = Actions.ActOnCXXForRangeStmt(
         getCurScope(), ForLoc, CoawaitLoc, FirstPart.get(),
-        ForRangeInit.ColonLoc, ForRangeInit.RangeExpr.get(),
+        ForRangeInit.ColonLoc, CorrectedRange.get(),
         T.getCloseLocation(), Sema::BFRK_Build);
 
   // Similarly, we need to do the semantic analysis for a for-range
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to