NoQ added a comment. In D62883#1536894 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62883#1536894>, @Szelethus wrote:
> I'm not sure how long it'll take for me to figure out what's wrong, but these > numbers are so ridiculous, I suspect a programming error rather then an > algorithmic issue. > > edit: I seem to have found a solution, I'll share more later when I get to > evaluate this :) At a glance, it might be that `bugreporter::trackExpressionValue()` is called on every node within the block, rather than only once in a lifetime of the visitor. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62883/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62883 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
