lhames added a comment. In D66705#1644166 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66705#1644166>, @dexonsmith wrote:
> Updated patch after running `check-clang` and learning more about `Expected`. > I've added a parallel API using `Optional<FileEntryRef>` for clients that > don't want to do anything with the error. > > @lhames, is it reasonable to add `llvm::expectedToOptional`? Absolutely: We've already got an errorToBool, so expectedToOptional makes sense. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66705/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66705 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
