Szelethus added a comment. In D66733#1647964 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66733#1647964>, @steakhal wrote:
> @Szelethus The mispositioned report message was my fault. I used a different > version of clang for the analysis and to upload the results, which resulted > in some mispositioned reports. > I've fixed the linked CodeChecker instance. If you want to see how the analyzer behaves, I advise to keep an LLVM repository purely for analysis that you're not ever refreshing, and a separate one for building your clang :) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66733/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66733 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits