Szelethus added a comment.

In D66733#1647964 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66733#1647964>, @steakhal wrote:

> @Szelethus The mispositioned report message was my fault. I used a different 
> version of clang for the analysis and to upload the results, which resulted 
> in some mispositioned reports.
>  I've fixed the linked CodeChecker instance.


If you want to see how the analyzer behaves, I advise to keep an LLVM 
repository purely for analysis that you're not ever refreshing, and a separate 
one for building your clang :)


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D66733/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D66733



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to