aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/google-objc-require-category-method-prefixes.rst:41 + +.. option:: ExpectedPrefixes + ---------------- stephanemoore wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > stephanemoore wrote: > > > This option seems to describe a list of class prefixes that are > > > whitelisted. If that is the case, perhaps `WhitelistedPrefixes` or > > > `WhitelistedClassPrefixes` would be a better name for the option? WDYT? > > No, please. We should try to avoid "white" and "black" lists in favor of > > more descriptive terms with less social connotations. I'd be fine with > > `ExpectedClassPrefixes`, `AllowedPrefixes`, `KnownPrefixes`, etc. > Makes sense. Would `ExemptClassPrefixes` work? I think that'd be a great name. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65917/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65917 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
