Szelethus marked 2 inline comments as done.
Szelethus added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp:378-379
+
+  using CheckFn = void (MallocChecker::*)(CheckerContext &C, const CallExpr 
*CE,
+                                          ProgramStateRef State) const;
+
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> Whenever i see a (`CE`, `State`) pair, it screams `CallEvent` to me. That 
> said, i'm worried that `State` in these callbacks isn't necessarily equal to 
> `C.getState()` (the latter, by the way, is always equal to the `CallEvent`'s 
> `.getState()` - that's a relief, right?), so if you'll ever be in the mood to 
> check that, that'd be great :)
It should be always equal to it. I'll change it.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp:397-398
+  CallDescriptionMap<CheckFn> NonFreeingMemFnMap{
+      {{"alloca", 1}, &MallocChecker::checkAlloca},
+      {{"_alloca", 1}, &MallocChecker::checkAlloca},
+      {{"malloc", 1}, &MallocChecker::checkMalloc},
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> I think `alloca` deserves `CDF_MaybeBuiltin`. This would also probably allow 
> you to remove the second line.
Actually, `BuiltinFunctionChecker` uses `evalCall` to create an `AllocaRegion` 
for `__builtin_alloca`. I spent an hour when writing this patch to track a 
crash down when I initially made this `CDF_MaybeBuiltin` :)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D68165/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D68165



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to