poelmanc added a comment. In D69238#1739429 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69238#1739429>, @gribozavr2 wrote:
> If it is indeed the extra AST node for the elidable constructor, see if you > can use the `ignoringElidableConstructorCall` AST matcher to ignore it, > therefore smoothing over AST differences between language modes. Thanks for the tip. Adding `ignoringElidableConstructorCall` in front of `cxxConstructExpr` for the `EmptyStringCtorExpr` and `EmptyStringCtorExprWithTemporaries` in RedundantStringInitCheck.cpp resulted in the checker no longer matching any of `std::string a = ""` lines, i.e. basically disabling the check for those types of lines. Is there a tool to print the AST? That would show whether the AST already has some expression with the right SourceRange. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69238/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69238 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
