dschuff added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/WebAssembly.cpp:96
+  if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_O_Group)) {
+    if (const char *WasmOptPath = getenv("WASM_OPT")) {
+      StringRef OOpt = "s";
----------------
sunfish wrote:
> dschuff wrote:
> > What would you think about adding a way to pass arguments through to 
> > wasm-opt on the command line, like we have for the linker, assembler, etc? 
> > Something like `-Wo,-O2` (or `-Ww` or whatever; analogous to `-Wl` and 
> > `-Wa`). That seems nicer than an env var, although it doesn't solve the 
> > problem of controlling whether to run the optimizer in the first place.
> My guess here is that we don't need clang to have an option for passing 
> additional flags -- if people want to do extra special things with wasm-opt 
> on clang's output they can just run wasm-opt directly themselves. Does that 
> sound reasonable?
Maybe. But I still don't like the use of an env var for this kind of 
behavior-effecting (i.e. non-debugging) use case.  It's hard enough to get 
reproducible and hermetic build behavior as it is, I definitely wouldn't want 
to worry about the environment affecting the output in addition to all the 
random flags, included files, etc.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D70500/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D70500



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to