aaron.ballman added a comment. In D68923#1853302 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923#1853302>, @aaronpuchert wrote:
> Thanks for the reviews! Do you think it makes sense to bring this to Clang 10? I think it's a simple enough fix that it may be worth it, but it isn't fixing a regression in behavior so it's not critical. If it helps you out to move it onto the 10 branch, I think it's fine. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits