aaron.ballman added a comment.

In D68923#1853302 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923#1853302>, @aaronpuchert 
wrote:

> Thanks for the reviews! Do you think it makes sense to bring this to Clang 10?


I think it's a simple enough fix that it may be worth it, but it isn't fixing a 
regression in behavior so it's not critical. If it helps you out to move it 
onto the 10 branch, I think it's fine.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to