aaronpuchert added a comment. In D68923#1853303 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923#1853303>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D68923#1853302 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923#1853302>, @aaronpuchert > wrote: > > > Thanks for the reviews! Do you think it makes sense to bring this to Clang > > 10? > > > I think it's a simple enough fix that it may be worth it, but it isn't fixing > a regression in behavior so it's not critical. Exactly, it would just be a bug fix. > If it helps you out to move it onto the 10 branch, I think it's fine. I might be porting this back anyways on downstream, but I don't want to be selfish. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
