steakhal added a comment. In D71524#1902654 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71524#1902654>, @steakhal wrote:
> In D71524#1889566 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71524#1889566>, @boga95 wrote: > > > @steakhal's revision is on the top of this. Changing the order will only > > cause unnecessary work on both sides. > > > I would happily rebase this patch if you want. Here is the rebased version of your patch. https://github.com/steakhal/llvm-project/compare/use-callevent...steakhal:boga-rebased-tainted-objects-D71524 Minor modifications applied: - clang-formatted every modified lines - simplified the `getArgWithImplicitThis` function body - simplified the `getNumArgsWithImplicitThis` function body - omitting the spelling of the `TaintPropagationRule` type name where obvious CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71524/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71524 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
