Szelethus added a comment. In D75682#1940901 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75682#1940901>, @balazske wrote:
> So what is missing or wrong in this change to be accepted? This change is functional but is not testable. But the high level idea is great! I think we should maybe merge this with the followup, as you originally intended to. Also, judging from the fact that how differently we imagined this to go (even though imo your idea is superior to mine), we should explain what our state splitting ideology is in the code. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75682/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75682 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
