jdenny updated this revision to Diff 261998.
jdenny added a comment.
Fixed a missed rename in the test code in the last update.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D79276/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D79276
Files:
clang/test/CodeGen/default-address-space.c
clang/test/CodeGenOpenCL/addr-space-struct-arg.cl
clang/test/Driver/hip-device-libs.hip
llvm/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.rst
llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileCheck.h
llvm/lib/Support/FileCheck.cpp
llvm/test/Assembler/drop-debug-info-nonzero-alloca.ll
llvm/test/FileCheck/comment.txt
llvm/test/FileCheck/first-character-match.txt
llvm/test/FileCheck/validate-check-prefix.txt
llvm/utils/FileCheck/FileCheck.cpp
Index: llvm/utils/FileCheck/FileCheck.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/utils/FileCheck/FileCheck.cpp
+++ llvm/utils/FileCheck/FileCheck.cpp
@@ -44,6 +44,14 @@
cl::desc(
"Alias for -check-prefix permitting multiple comma separated values"));
+static cl::list<std::string> CommentPrefixes(
+ "comment-prefixes", cl::CommaSeparated, cl::Hidden,
+ cl::desc("Comma-separated list of comment prefixes to use from check file\n"
+ "(defaults to 'COM,RUN'). Please avoid using this feature in\n"
+ "LLVM's LIT-based test suites, which should be easier to\n"
+ "maintain if they all follow a consistent comment style. This\n"
+ "feature is meant for non-LIT test suites using FileCheck."));
+
static cl::opt<bool> NoCanonicalizeWhiteSpace(
"strict-whitespace",
cl::desc("Do not treat all horizontal whitespace as equivalent"));
@@ -279,6 +287,8 @@
return "label";
case Check::CheckEmpty:
return "empty";
+ case Check::CheckComment:
+ return "com";
case Check::CheckEOF:
return "eof";
case Check::CheckBadNot:
@@ -565,6 +575,9 @@
for (StringRef Prefix : CheckPrefixes)
Req.CheckPrefixes.push_back(Prefix);
+ for (StringRef Prefix : CommentPrefixes)
+ Req.CommentPrefixes.push_back(Prefix);
+
for (StringRef CheckNot : ImplicitCheckNot)
Req.ImplicitCheckNot.push_back(CheckNot);
Index: llvm/test/FileCheck/validate-check-prefix.txt
===================================================================
--- llvm/test/FileCheck/validate-check-prefix.txt
+++ llvm/test/FileCheck/validate-check-prefix.txt
@@ -8,6 +8,6 @@
; BAD_PREFIX: supplied check prefix must start with a letter and contain only alphanumeric characters, hyphens, and underscores: 'A!'
-; DUPLICATE_PREFIX: error: supplied check prefix must be unique among check prefixes: 'REPEAT'
+; DUPLICATE_PREFIX: error: supplied check prefix must be unique among check prefixes and comment prefixes: 'REPEAT'
; EMPTY_PREFIX: error: supplied check prefix must not be the empty string
Index: llvm/test/FileCheck/first-character-match.txt
===================================================================
--- llvm/test/FileCheck/first-character-match.txt
+++ llvm/test/FileCheck/first-character-match.txt
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-RUN: FileCheck -check-prefix=RUN -input-file %s %s
+RUN: FileCheck -check-prefix=RUN --comment-prefixes=COM -input-file %s %s
// Prefix is at the first character in the file. The run line then matches itself.
Index: llvm/test/FileCheck/comment.txt
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ llvm/test/FileCheck/comment.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+// Comment directives successfully comment out check directives.
+//
+// Check all default comment prefixes.
+// Check that a comment directive at the beginning/end of the file is handled.
+// Check that the preceding/following line's check directive is not affected.
+// RUN: echo 'foo' > %t-supresses1.in
+// RUN: echo 'COM: CHECK: bar' > %t-supresses1.chk
+// RUN: echo 'CHECK: foo' >> %t-supresses1.chk
+// RUN: echo 'RUN: echo "CHECK: baz"' >> %t-supresses1.chk
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput \
+// RUN: FileCheck -vv %t-supresses1.chk < %t-supresses1.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=SUPPRESSES-CHECKS -DCHECK_LINE=2 %s
+//
+// Check the case of one user-specified comment prefix.
+// Check that a comment directive not at the beginning of a line is handled.
+// RUN: echo 'foo' > %t-suppresses2.in
+// RUN: echo 'CHECK: foo' > %t-suppresses2.chk
+// RUN: echo 'letters then space MY-PREFIX: CHECK: bar' >> %t-suppresses2.chk
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput \
+// RUN: FileCheck -vv %t-suppresses2.chk -comment-prefixes=MY-PREFIX \
+// RUN: < %t-suppresses2.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=SUPPRESSES-CHECKS -DCHECK_LINE=1 %s
+//
+// Check the case of multiple user-specified comment prefixes.
+// RUN: echo 'foo' > %t-suppresses3.in
+// RUN: echo 'Bar_2: CHECK: Bar' > %t-suppresses3.chk
+// RUN: echo 'CHECK: foo' >> %t-suppresses3.chk
+// RUN: echo 'Foo_1: CHECK: Foo' >> %t-suppresses3.chk
+// RUN: echo 'Baz_3: CHECK: Baz' >> %t-suppresses3.chk
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput \
+// RUN: FileCheck -vv %t-suppresses3.chk -comment-prefixes=Foo_1,Bar_2 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes=Baz_3 < %t-suppresses3.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=SUPPRESSES-CHECKS -DCHECK_LINE=2 %s
+//
+// SUPPRESSES-CHECKS: .chk:[[CHECK_LINE]]:8: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
+
+// A comment directive is not recognized within a check directive's pattern and
+// thus does not comment out the remainder of the pattern.
+//
+// RUN: echo 'foo' > %t-within.in
+// RUN: echo 'CHECK: foo COM: bar' > %t-within.chk
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput \
+// RUN: not FileCheck %t-within.chk < %t-within.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=WITHIN-CHECKS %s
+//
+// WITHIN-CHECKS: .chk:1:8: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
+
+// Comment directives with blank contents are fine.
+//
+// RUN: echo 'foo' > %t-blank.in
+// RUN: echo 'COM:' > %t-blank.chk
+// RUN: echo 'CHECK: foo' >> %t-blank.chk
+// RUN: echo ' COM: ' >> %t-blank.chk
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput FileCheck -vv %t-blank.chk < %t-blank.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=BLANK-COMMENTS %s
+//
+// BLANK-COMMENTS: .chk:2:8: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
+
+// Comment prefixes plus check directive suffixes are not comment directives
+// and are treated as plain text.
+//
+// RUN: echo foo > %t-suffixes.in
+// RUN: echo bar >> %t-suffixes.in
+// RUN: echo 'COM-NEXT: CHECK: foo' > %t-suffixes.chk
+// RUN: echo 'RUN-NOT: CHECK: bar' >> %t-suffixes.chk
+//
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput \
+// RUN: FileCheck -vv %t-suffixes.chk < %t-suffixes.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=SUFFIXES1 %s
+//
+// SUFFIXES1: .chk:1:18: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
+// SUFFIXES1: .chk:2:17: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
+//
+// But we can define them as comment prefixes.
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput \
+// RUN: FileCheck -vv %t-suffixes.chk < %t-suffixes.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes=COM,RUN,RUN-NOT \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=SUFFIXES2 %s
+//
+// SUFFIXES2: .chk:1:18: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
+// SUFFIXES2-NOT: .chk:2
+
+// Not using comment directives is always fine.
+//
+// RUN: echo 'foo' > %t-unused-com.in
+// RUN: echo 'CHECK: foo' > %t-unused-com.chk
+//
+// Check the case of default comment prefixes.
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput \
+// RUN: FileCheck -vv %t-unused-com.chk < %t-unused-com.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=UNUSED-COMMENT-PREFIXES %s
+//
+// Specifying non-default comment prefixes doesn't mean you have to use them.
+// For example, they might be applied to an entire test suite via
+// FILECHECK_OPTS or via a wrapper command or substitution.
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput \
+// RUN: FileCheck -vv %t-unused-com.chk < %t-unused-com.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes=FOO \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=UNUSED-COMMENT-PREFIXES %s
+//
+// UNUSED-COMMENT-PREFIXES: .chk:1:8: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
+
+// Comment directives do not suppress diagnostics for unused check prefixes.
+//
+// RUN: echo 'foo' > %t-unused-check.in
+// RUN: echo 'COM: foo' > %t-unused-check.chk
+// RUN: echo 'RUN: echo' >> %t-unused-check.chk
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput \
+// RUN: not FileCheck %t-unused-check.chk < %t-unused-check.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=UNUSED-CHECK-PREFIXES %s
+//
+// UNUSED-CHECK-PREFIXES: error: no check strings found with prefix 'CHECK:'
+
+// Comment prefixes are not recognized at ends of words.
+//
+// RUN: echo 'foo' > %t-after-words.in
+// RUN: echo 'bar' >> %t-after-words.in
+// RUN: echo 'foo' >> %t-after-words.in
+// RUN: echo 'bar' >> %t-after-words.in
+// RUN: echo 'FOO-COM: CHECK: foo' > %t-after-words.chk
+// RUN: echo 'RUN_COM: CHECK: bar' >> %t-after-words.chk
+// RUN: echo 'RUN3COM: CHECK: foo' >> %t-after-words.chk
+// RUN: echo ' COMRUN: CHECK: bar' >> %t-after-words.chk
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput \
+// RUN: FileCheck -vv %t-after-words.chk < %t-after-words.in 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=AFTER-WORDS %s
+//
+// AFTER-WORDS: .chk:1:17: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
+// AFTER-WORDS: .chk:2:17: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
+// AFTER-WORDS: .chk:3:17: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
+// AFTER-WORDS: .chk:4:17: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
+
+// Bad comment prefixes are diagnosed.
+//
+// Check empty comment prefix.
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput not FileCheck /dev/null < /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes= \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=PREFIX-EMPTY %s
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput not FileCheck /dev/null < /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes=,FOO \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=PREFIX-EMPTY %s
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput not FileCheck /dev/null < /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes=FOO, \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=PREFIX-EMPTY %s
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput not FileCheck /dev/null < /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes=FOO,,BAR \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=PREFIX-EMPTY %s
+// PREFIX-EMPTY: error: supplied comment prefix must not be the empty string
+//
+// Check invalid characters in comment prefix.
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput not FileCheck /dev/null < /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes=. \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=PREFIX-BAD-CHAR1 %s
+// PREFIX-BAD-CHAR1: error: supplied comment prefix must start with a letter and contain only alphanumeric characters, hyphens, and underscores: '.'
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput not FileCheck /dev/null < /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes='foo ' \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=PREFIX-BAD-CHAR2 %s
+// PREFIX-BAD-CHAR2: error: supplied comment prefix must start with a letter and contain only alphanumeric characters, hyphens, and underscores: 'foo '
+//
+// Check duplicate comment prefixes.
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput not FileCheck /dev/null < /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes=FOO,BAR,BAZ,BAR \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=COMMENT-PREFIX-DUP %s
+// COMMENT-PREFIX-DUP: error: supplied comment prefix must be unique among check prefixes and comment prefixes: 'BAR'
+//
+// Check user-supplied check prefix that duplicates a default comment prefix.
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput not FileCheck /dev/null < /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -check-prefixes=FOO,COM \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-PREFIX-DUP-COMMENT %s
+// CHECK-PREFIX-DUP-COMMENT: error: supplied check prefix must be unique among check prefixes and comment prefixes: 'COM'
+//
+// Check user-supplied comment prefix that duplicates default check prefixes.
+// RUN: %ProtectFileCheckOutput not FileCheck /dev/null < /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: -comment-prefixes=CHECK \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=COMMENT-PREFIX-DUP-CHECK %s
+// COMMENT-PREFIX-DUP-CHECK: error: supplied comment prefix must be unique among check prefixes and comment prefixes: 'CHECK'
Index: llvm/test/Assembler/drop-debug-info-nonzero-alloca.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/test/Assembler/drop-debug-info-nonzero-alloca.ll
+++ llvm/test/Assembler/drop-debug-info-nonzero-alloca.ll
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s -o %t.bc -data-layout=A5 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefixes=COM,AS %s
-; RUN: llvm-dis < %t.bc | FileCheck -check-prefixes=COM,DIS %s
-; RUN: opt < %s -S -data-layout=A5 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefixes=COM,AS %s
-; RUN: opt < %t.bc -S | FileCheck -check-prefixes=COM,DIS %s
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s -o %t.bc -data-layout=A5 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefixes=ALL,AS %s
+; RUN: llvm-dis < %t.bc | FileCheck -check-prefixes=ALL,DIS %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -S -data-layout=A5 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefixes=ALL,AS %s
+; RUN: opt < %t.bc -S | FileCheck -check-prefixes=ALL,DIS %s
define void @foo() {
entry:
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
metadata i8* undef,
metadata !DILocalVariable(scope: !1),
metadata !DIExpression())
-; COM-NOT: Allocation instruction pointer not in the stack address space!
+; ALL-NOT: Allocation instruction pointer not in the stack address space!
; AS: llvm.dbg.value intrinsic requires a !dbg attachment
; AS: warning: ignoring invalid debug info in <stdin>
ret void
Index: llvm/lib/Support/FileCheck.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/Support/FileCheck.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Support/FileCheck.cpp
@@ -1110,6 +1110,8 @@
return Prefix.str() + "-LABEL";
case Check::CheckEmpty:
return Prefix.str() + "-EMPTY";
+ case Check::CheckComment:
+ return std::string(Prefix);
case Check::CheckEOF:
return "implicit EOF";
case Check::CheckBadNot:
@@ -1121,13 +1123,24 @@
}
static std::pair<Check::FileCheckType, StringRef>
-FindCheckType(StringRef Buffer, StringRef Prefix) {
+FindCheckType(const FileCheckRequest &Req, StringRef Buffer, StringRef Prefix) {
if (Buffer.size() <= Prefix.size())
return {Check::CheckNone, StringRef()};
char NextChar = Buffer[Prefix.size()];
StringRef Rest = Buffer.drop_front(Prefix.size() + 1);
+
+ // Check for comment.
+ if (Req.CommentPrefixes.end() != std::find(Req.CommentPrefixes.begin(),
+ Req.CommentPrefixes.end(),
+ Prefix)) {
+ if (NextChar == ':')
+ return {Check::CheckComment, Rest};
+ // Ignore a comment prefix if it has a suffix like "-NOT".
+ return {Check::CheckNone, StringRef()};
+ }
+
// Verify that the : is present after the prefix.
if (NextChar == ':')
return {Check::CheckPlain, Rest};
@@ -1206,8 +1219,9 @@
/// If no valid prefix is found, the state of Buffer, LineNumber, and CheckTy
/// is unspecified.
static std::pair<StringRef, StringRef>
-FindFirstMatchingPrefix(Regex &PrefixRE, StringRef &Buffer,
- unsigned &LineNumber, Check::FileCheckType &CheckTy) {
+FindFirstMatchingPrefix(const FileCheckRequest &Req, Regex &PrefixRE,
+ StringRef &Buffer, unsigned &LineNumber,
+ Check::FileCheckType &CheckTy) {
SmallVector<StringRef, 2> Matches;
while (!Buffer.empty()) {
@@ -1235,7 +1249,7 @@
if (Skipped.empty() || !IsPartOfWord(Skipped.back())) {
// Now extract the type.
StringRef AfterSuffix;
- std::tie(CheckTy, AfterSuffix) = FindCheckType(Buffer, Prefix);
+ std::tie(CheckTy, AfterSuffix) = FindCheckType(Req, Buffer, Prefix);
// If we've found a valid check type for this prefix, we're done.
if (CheckTy != Check::CheckNone)
@@ -1316,7 +1330,7 @@
// found.
unsigned LineNumber = 1;
- bool FoundUsedPrefix = false;
+ bool FoundUsedCheckPrefix = false;
while (1) {
Check::FileCheckType CheckTy;
@@ -1324,10 +1338,11 @@
StringRef UsedPrefix;
StringRef AfterSuffix;
std::tie(UsedPrefix, AfterSuffix) =
- FindFirstMatchingPrefix(PrefixRE, Buffer, LineNumber, CheckTy);
+ FindFirstMatchingPrefix(Req, PrefixRE, Buffer, LineNumber, CheckTy);
if (UsedPrefix.empty())
break;
- FoundUsedPrefix = true;
+ if (CheckTy != Check::CheckComment)
+ FoundUsedCheckPrefix = true;
assert(UsedPrefix.data() == Buffer.data() &&
"Failed to move Buffer's start forward, or pointed prefix outside "
@@ -1370,9 +1385,17 @@
// Remember the location of the start of the pattern, for diagnostics.
SMLoc PatternLoc = SMLoc::getFromPointer(Buffer.data());
+ // Extract the pattern from the buffer.
+ StringRef PatternBuffer = Buffer.substr(0, EOL);
+ Buffer = Buffer.substr(EOL);
+
+ // If this is a comment, we're done.
+ if (CheckTy == Check::CheckComment)
+ continue;
+
// Parse the pattern.
Pattern P(CheckTy, PatternContext.get(), LineNumber);
- if (P.parsePattern(Buffer.substr(0, EOL), UsedPrefix, SM, Req))
+ if (P.parsePattern(PatternBuffer, UsedPrefix, SM, Req))
return true;
// Verify that CHECK-LABEL lines do not define or use variables
@@ -1384,8 +1407,6 @@
return true;
}
- Buffer = Buffer.substr(EOL);
-
// Verify that CHECK-NEXT/SAME/EMPTY lines have at least one CHECK line before them.
if ((CheckTy == Check::CheckNext || CheckTy == Check::CheckSame ||
CheckTy == Check::CheckEmpty) &&
@@ -1414,7 +1435,7 @@
// When there are no used prefixes we report an error except in the case that
// no prefix is specified explicitly but -implicit-check-not is specified.
- if (!FoundUsedPrefix &&
+ if (!FoundUsedCheckPrefix &&
(ImplicitNegativeChecks.empty() || !Req.IsDefaultCheckPrefix)) {
errs() << "error: no check strings found with prefix"
<< (Req.CheckPrefixes.size() > 1 ? "es " : " ");
@@ -1880,22 +1901,23 @@
return Validator.match(CheckPrefix);
}
-static bool ValidatePrefixes(StringSet<> &PrefixSet,
+static bool ValidatePrefixes(StringRef Kind, StringSet<> &PrefixSet,
const std::vector<StringRef> &Prefixes) {
for (StringRef Prefix : Prefixes) {
if (Prefix.empty()) {
- errs() << "error: supplied check prefix must not be the empty string\n";
+ errs() << "error: supplied " << Kind << " prefix must not be the empty "
+ << "string\n";
return false;
}
if (!ValidateCheckPrefix(Prefix)) {
- errs() << "error: supplied check prefix must start with a letter and "
- << "contain only alphanumeric characters, hyphens, and "
+ errs() << "error: supplied " << Kind << " prefix must start with a "
+ << "letter and contain only alphanumeric characters, hyphens, and "
<< "underscores: '" << Prefix << "'\n";
return false;
}
if (!PrefixSet.insert(Prefix).second) {
- errs() << "error: supplied check prefix must be unique among check "
- << "prefixes: '" << Prefix << "'\n";
+ errs() << "error: supplied " << Kind << " prefix must be unique among "
+ << "check prefixes and comment prefixes: '" << Prefix << "'\n";
return false;
}
}
@@ -1903,10 +1925,24 @@
}
static const char *DefaultCheckPrefixes[] = {"CHECK"};
+static const char *DefaultCommentPrefixes[] = {"COM", "RUN"};
bool FileCheck::ValidateCheckPrefixes() {
StringSet<> PrefixSet;
- if (!ValidatePrefixes(PrefixSet, Req.CheckPrefixes))
+ // Add default prefixes to catch user-supplied duplicates of them below.
+ if (Req.CheckPrefixes.empty()) {
+ for (const char *Prefix : DefaultCheckPrefixes)
+ PrefixSet.insert(Prefix);
+ }
+ if (Req.CommentPrefixes.empty()) {
+ for (const char *Prefix : DefaultCommentPrefixes)
+ PrefixSet.insert(Prefix);
+ }
+ // Do not validate the default prefixes, or diagnostics about duplicates might
+ // incorrectly indicate that they were supplied by the user.
+ if (!ValidatePrefixes("check", PrefixSet, Req.CheckPrefixes))
+ return false;
+ if (!ValidatePrefixes("comment", PrefixSet, Req.CommentPrefixes))
return false;
return true;
}
@@ -1917,15 +1953,23 @@
Req.CheckPrefixes.push_back(Prefix);
Req.IsDefaultCheckPrefix = true;
}
+ if (Req.CommentPrefixes.empty()) {
+ for (const char *Prefix : DefaultCommentPrefixes)
+ Req.CommentPrefixes.push_back(Prefix);
+ }
- // We already validated the contents of CheckPrefixes so just concatenate
- // them as alternatives.
+ // We already validated the contents of CheckPrefixes and CommentPrefixes so
+ // just concatenate them as alternatives.
SmallString<32> PrefixRegexStr;
for (size_t I = 0, E = Req.CheckPrefixes.size(); I != E; ++I) {
if (I != 0)
PrefixRegexStr.push_back('|');
PrefixRegexStr.append(Req.CheckPrefixes[I]);
}
+ for (StringRef Prefix : Req.CommentPrefixes) {
+ PrefixRegexStr.push_back('|');
+ PrefixRegexStr.append(Prefix);
+ }
return Regex(PrefixRegexStr);
}
Index: llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileCheck.h
===================================================================
--- llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileCheck.h
+++ llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileCheck.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
/// Contains info about various FileCheck options.
struct FileCheckRequest {
std::vector<StringRef> CheckPrefixes;
+ std::vector<StringRef> CommentPrefixes;
bool NoCanonicalizeWhiteSpace = false;
std::vector<StringRef> ImplicitCheckNot;
std::vector<StringRef> GlobalDefines;
@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@
CheckDAG,
CheckLabel,
CheckEmpty,
+ CheckComment,
/// Indicates the pattern only matches the end of file. This is used for
/// trailing CHECK-NOTs.
Index: llvm/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.rst
===================================================================
--- llvm/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.rst
+++ llvm/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.rst
@@ -39,15 +39,31 @@
match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
- :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
- prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
- change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
+ :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify (without the trailing
+ "``:``") one or more prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests
+ which might change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
+
+ FileCheck does not permit duplicate prefixes, even if one is a check prefix
+ and one is a comment prefix (see :option:`--comment-prefixes` below).
.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be
specified as a comma separated list.
+.. option:: --comment-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
+
+ By default, FileCheck ignores any occurrence in ``match-filename`` of any check
+ prefix if it is preceded on the same line by "``COM:``" or "``RUN:``". See the
+ section `The "COM:" directive`_ for usage details.
+
+ These default comment prefixes can be overridden by
+ :option:`--comment-prefixes` if they are not appropriate for your testing
+ environment. However, doing so is not recommended in LLVM's LIT-based test
+ suites, which should be easier to maintain if they all follow a consistent
+ comment style. In that case, consider proposing a change to the default
+ comment prefixes instead.
+
.. option:: --input-file filename
File to check (defaults to stdin).
@@ -236,6 +252,57 @@
In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
+The "COM:" directive
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Sometimes you want to disable a FileCheck directive without removing it
+entirely, or you want to write comments that mention a directive by name. The
+"``COM:``" directive makes it easy to do this. For example, you might have:
+
+.. code-block:: llvm
+
+ ; X32: pinsrd_1:
+ ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
+
+ ; COM: FIXME: X64 isn't working correctly yet for this part of codegen, but
+ ; COM: X64 will have something similar to X32:
+ ; COM:
+ ; COM: X64: pinsrd_1:
+ ; COM: X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
+
+Without "``COM:``", you would need to use some combination of rewording and
+directive syntax mangling to prevent FileCheck from recognizing the commented
+occurrences of "``X32:``" and "``X64:``" above as directives. Moreover,
+FileCheck diagnostics have been proposed that might complain about the above
+occurrences of "``X64``" that don't have the trailing "``:``" because they look
+like directive typos. Dodging all these problems can be tedious for a test
+author, and directive syntax mangling can make the purpose of test code unclear.
+"``COM:``" avoids all these problems.
+
+A few important usage notes:
+
+* "``COM:``" within another directive's pattern does *not* comment out the
+ remainder of the pattern. For example:
+
+ .. code-block:: llvm
+
+ ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0 COM: This is part of the X32 pattern!
+
+ If you need to temporarily comment out part of a directive's pattern, move it
+ to another line. The reason is that FileCheck parses "``COM:``" in the same
+ manner as any other directive: only the first directive on the line is
+ recognized as a directive.
+
+* For the sake of LIT, FileCheck treats "``RUN:``" just like "``COM:``". If this
+ is not suitable for your test environment, see :option:`--comment-prefixes`.
+
+* FileCheck does not recognize "``COM``", "``RUN``", or any user-defined comment
+ prefix as a comment directive if it's combined with one of the usual check
+ directive suffixes, such as "``-NEXT:``" or "``-NOT:``", discussed below.
+ FileCheck treats such a combination as plain text instead. If it needs to act
+ as a comment directive for your test environment, define it as such with
+ :option:`--comment-prefixes`.
+
The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Index: clang/test/Driver/hip-device-libs.hip
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Driver/hip-device-libs.hip
+++ clang/test/Driver/hip-device-libs.hip
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
// RUN: --cuda-gpu-arch=gfx803 \
// RUN: --hip-device-lib-path=%S/Inputs/hip_dev_lib \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM,FLUSHD
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL,FLUSHD
// Test subtarget with flushing off by ddefault.
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
// RUN: --cuda-gpu-arch=gfx900 \
// RUN: --hip-device-lib-path=%S/Inputs/hip_dev_lib \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM,NOFLUSHD
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL,NOFLUSHD
// Test explicit flag, opposite of target default.
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
// RUN: -fcuda-flush-denormals-to-zero \
// RUN: --hip-device-lib-path=%S/Inputs/hip_dev_lib \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM,FLUSHD
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL,FLUSHD
// Test explicit flag, opposite of target default.
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
// RUN: -fno-cuda-flush-denormals-to-zero \
// RUN: --hip-device-lib-path=%S/Inputs/hip_dev_lib \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM,NOFLUSHD
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL,NOFLUSHD
// Test explicit flag, same as target default.
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
// RUN: -fno-cuda-flush-denormals-to-zero \
// RUN: --hip-device-lib-path=%S/Inputs/hip_dev_lib \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM,NOFLUSHD
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL,NOFLUSHD
// Test explicit flag, same as target default.
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
// RUN: -fcuda-flush-denormals-to-zero \
// RUN: --hip-device-lib-path=%S/Inputs/hip_dev_lib \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM,FLUSHD
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL,FLUSHD
// Test last flag wins, not flushing
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
// RUN: -fcuda-flush-denormals-to-zero -fno-cuda-flush-denormals-to-zero \
// RUN: --hip-device-lib-path=%S/Inputs/hip_dev_lib \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM,NOFLUSHD
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL,NOFLUSHD
// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64-linux-gnu \
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
// RUN: -fcuda-flush-denormals-to-zero -fno-cuda-flush-denormals-to-zero \
// RUN: --hip-device-lib-path=%S/Inputs/hip_dev_lib \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM,NOFLUSHD
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL,NOFLUSHD
// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64-linux-gnu \
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
// RUN: -fno-cuda-flush-denormals-to-zero -fcuda-flush-denormals-to-zero \
// RUN: --hip-device-lib-path=%S/Inputs/hip_dev_lib \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM,FLUSHD
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL,FLUSHD
// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64-linux-gnu \
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
// RUN: -fno-cuda-flush-denormals-to-zero -fcuda-flush-denormals-to-zero \
// RUN: --hip-device-lib-path=%S/Inputs/hip_dev_lib \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM,FLUSHD
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL,FLUSHD
// Test environment variable HIP_DEVICE_LIB_PATH
@@ -96,11 +96,11 @@
// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64-linux-gnu \
// RUN: --cuda-gpu-arch=gfx900 \
// RUN: %S/Inputs/hip_multiple_inputs/b.hip \
-// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=COM
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=ALL
-// COM: {{"[^"]*clang[^"]*"}}
-// COM-SAME: "-mlink-builtin-bitcode" "{{.*}}hip.amdgcn.bc"
-// COM-SAME: "-mlink-builtin-bitcode" "{{.*}}ocml.amdgcn.bc"
-// COM-SAME: "-mlink-builtin-bitcode" "{{.*}}ockl.amdgcn.bc"
+// ALL: {{"[^"]*clang[^"]*"}}
+// ALL-SAME: "-mlink-builtin-bitcode" "{{.*}}hip.amdgcn.bc"
+// ALL-SAME: "-mlink-builtin-bitcode" "{{.*}}ocml.amdgcn.bc"
+// ALL-SAME: "-mlink-builtin-bitcode" "{{.*}}ockl.amdgcn.bc"
// FLUSHD-SAME: "-mlink-builtin-bitcode" "{{.*}}oclc_daz_opt_on.amdgcn.bc"
// NOFLUSHD-SAME: "-mlink-builtin-bitcode" "{{.*}}oclc_daz_opt_off.amdgcn.bc"
Index: clang/test/CodeGenOpenCL/addr-space-struct-arg.cl
===================================================================
--- clang/test/CodeGenOpenCL/addr-space-struct-arg.cl
+++ clang/test/CodeGenOpenCL/addr-space-struct-arg.cl
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - -O0 -ffake-address-space-map -triple i686-pc-darwin | FileCheck -enable-var-scope -check-prefixes=COM,X86 %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - -O0 -triple amdgcn | FileCheck -enable-var-scope -check-prefixes=COM,AMDGCN %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - -cl-std=CL2.0 -O0 -triple amdgcn | FileCheck -enable-var-scope -check-prefixes=COM,AMDGCN,AMDGCN20 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - -O0 -ffake-address-space-map -triple i686-pc-darwin | FileCheck -enable-var-scope -check-prefixes=ALL,X86 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - -O0 -triple amdgcn | FileCheck -enable-var-scope -check-prefixes=ALL,AMDGCN %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - -cl-std=CL2.0 -O0 -triple amdgcn | FileCheck -enable-var-scope -check-prefixes=ALL,AMDGCN,AMDGCN20 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - -cl-std=CL1.2 -O0 -triple spir-unknown-unknown-unknown | FileCheck -enable-var-scope -check-prefixes=SPIR %s
typedef int int2 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(2)));
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
return out;
}
-// COM-LABEL: define {{.*}} void @ker
+// ALL-LABEL: define {{.*}} void @ker
// Expect two mem copies: one for the argument "in", and one for
// the return value.
// X86: call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p1i8.i32(i8*
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
return out;
}
-// COM-LABEL: define {{.*}} void @ker_large
+// ALL-LABEL: define {{.*}} void @ker_large
// Expect two mem copies: one for the argument "in", and one for
// the return value.
// X86: call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p1i8.i32(i8*
Index: clang/test/CodeGen/default-address-space.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/CodeGen/default-address-space.c
+++ clang/test/CodeGen/default-address-space.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn---amdgiz -emit-llvm < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK,COM %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn---amdgiz -emit-llvm < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK %s
// CHECK-DAG: @foo = addrspace(1) global i32 0
int foo;
@@ -11,17 +11,17 @@
int *A;
int *B;
-// COM-LABEL: define i32 @test1()
+// CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @test1()
// CHECK: load i32, i32* addrspacecast{{[^@]+}} @foo
int test1() { return foo; }
-// COM-LABEL: define i32 @test2(i32 %i)
-// COM: %[[addr:.*]] = getelementptr
+// CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @test2(i32 %i)
+// CHECK: %[[addr:.*]] = getelementptr
// CHECK: load i32, i32* %[[addr]]
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i32
int test2(int i) { return ban[i]; }
-// COM-LABEL: define void @test3()
+// CHECK-LABEL: define void @test3()
// CHECK: load i32*, i32** addrspacecast{{.*}} @B
// CHECK: load i32, i32*
// CHECK: load i32*, i32** addrspacecast{{.*}} @A
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
