aaron.ballman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:115
+// either due to crashes or false positives.
+const char *getClangTidyBlacklist() {
+  static const std::string FalsePositives =
----------------
njames93 wrote:
> Return by StringRef?
How about `getDisabledClangTidyChecks()` (or literally any other name than 
blacklist)?


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:120
+                       // clangd doesn't replay those when using a preamble.
+                       "-llvm-header-guard");
+  static const std::string CrashingChecks =
----------------
I suspect there are more checks that should be added here. For instance, much 
of `modernize-` is purely stylistic so it's easy to view as being false 
positives (like `modernize-use-trailing-return-types` or whatever it's called).


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:127
+                       "-bugprone-use-after-move");
+  static const std::string BlackList =
+      llvm::join_items(", ", FalsePositives, CrashingChecks);
----------------
Similarly, rename this. I'd suggest `DisabledChecks`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D83224/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D83224

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to