kadircet added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:115
+// either due to crashes or false positives.
+const char *getClangTidyBlacklist() {
+ static const std::string FalsePositives =
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> njames93 wrote:
> > Return by StringRef?
> How about `getDisabledClangTidyChecks()` (or literally any other name than
> blacklist)?
thanks for bringing this to my attention, i will try to be more conscious next
time.
I would prefer allow/deny as `disabled` might also be offensive in some
contexts. Do you know if we already have some settlements around this one in
the wider community?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83224/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83224
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
