There is some issue, at least on staging. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed stages but marked as SUCCESS
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: > Thanks! > Done. > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area! >> Much appreciated. >> >> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. >> It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>> frequently offline. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks everyone! >>>> >>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>>> move all the green bots back there. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Galina >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> They do on staging. >>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>> >>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>>>> annotated commands: >>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK >>>>>> for now. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>>>>> gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build >>>>>>> bot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the >>>>>>> staging. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>>>>>>> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but >>>>>>>>> it will need more love and care. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I >>>>>>>> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting >>>>>>>> things to >>>>>>>> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to >>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep >>>>>>>> requirements >>>>>>>> of the script. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits