jfb added a subscriber: pcc. jfb added a comment. > I guess there's a more general issue here which is that LLVM appears to be > more permissive about prototype mismatch than wasm. Specifically, I'm > thinking about how swifterror relies on being able to pass extra parameters > to a function that doesn't expect them and not get UB. I guess as long as > LLVM doesn't introduce any prototype mismatch during optimization, that's OK, > but this seems like it would be a real problem if we ever wanted to port > swift to wasm.
Yeah @dschuff, @sunfish and I were also talking about `__cxa_pure_virtual` being in the same signature-type-mismatch category. I wonder if this also makes CFI sad, /cc @pcc. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19275 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
