pengfei added a comment. In D97318#2587866 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97318#2587866>, @yaxunl wrote:
> So should we revive this patch by classifying _Float16 as SSE, then it will > conform to the ABI. And we should be compatible with gcc assuming it also > follows the ABI. @pengfei Thanks @hliao for the information. Yes, we should classify _Float16 as SSE. Sorry for the misleading. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97318/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97318 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
