hvdijk added a comment. In D52050#2663205 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D52050#2663205>, @glaubitz wrote:
> I think, however, we should bump the rest of the paths to 10.2.0 if possible. I updated all the Linux trees that were on 4.6.0. The only remaining 4.6.0 trees are for Hurd, which seems to me like it was just a coincidence that it was on the same version. There are other Linux trees used for tests as well, but they were already on different versions of GCC so we do not introduce any new inconsistencies by leaving those as they are. I noticed that I left out one of the 4.6.0 directories by mistake in what I put up for review, that did not affect test results. I included that as obvious in what I pushed. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D52050/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D52050 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
