glaubitz added a comment. In D52050#2663247 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D52050#2663247>, @hvdijk wrote:
> In D52050#2663205 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D52050#2663205>, @glaubitz wrote: > >> I think, however, we should bump the rest of the paths to 10.2.0 if possible. > > I updated all the Linux trees that were on 4.6.0. The only remaining 4.6.0 > trees are for Hurd, which seems to me like it was just a coincidence that it > was on the same version. There are other Linux trees used for tests as well, > but they were already on different versions of GCC so we do not introduce any > new inconsistencies by leaving those as they are. > > I noticed that I left out one of the 4.6.0 directories by mistake in what I > put up for review, that did not affect test results. I included that as > obvious in what I pushed. OK. Glad this has been fixed, in any case. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D52050/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D52050 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
