tra added a comment.
In D101630#2798975 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D101630#2798975>, @yaxunl wrote:
> For sure we will need -fgpu-bundle-device-output to control bundling of
> intermediate files. Then adding -emit-gpu-object and -emit-gpu-bundle may be
> redundant and can cause confusion. What if users specify `-c
> -fgpu-bundle-device-output -emit-gpu-object` or `-c
> -fno-gpu-bundle-device-output -emit-gpu-bundle`? To me a single option
> -fgpu-bundle-device-output to control all device output seems cleaner.
The idea is to use `-emit-gpu-object` and `-emit-gpu-bundle` instead of the
`-f[no-]gpu-bundle-device-output`. Otherwise they'd do exactly the same thing.
I think `-emit-gpu-{object,bundle}` has a minor edge over
`-f[no-]gpu-bundle-device-output` as it's similar to other -emit options for
controlling clang compilation phases (and that's what we want to do here),
while `-f` options are usually for tweaking code generation.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D101630/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D101630
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
