nridge added a comment. In D104619#2846258 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104619#2846258>, @dblaikie wrote:
> if that's the case, maybe there's room to refactor the commonality - avoiding > the near(if it is near) duplication and justifying the complexity/more > general design a bit more, by having more uses to generalize over? That had occurred to me as well. I'm happy to try! Would it perhaps make sense to do that in a follow-up patch? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104619/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104619 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
