rsmith added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18035#437715, @rengolin wrote:
> The 3.8.1 deadline is tomorrow and I'd really like to see these two patches > (plus the related fixes) in it, Realistically, this seems unlikely to make it in time. > or some LTS Linux distributions will live without them, and thus with > completely broken copies of LLVM. No, they'll be shipping with a broken copy of their C++ standard library, and will fail to conform to the Linux Standards Base specifications due to deviating from the Itanium C++ ABI. This patch is working around another popular implementation's failure to follow the relevant specification, nothing more. Please try to appropriately apportion the responsibility here; if your distribution opted into a non-standard ABI for their C++ standard library, you should point out to them that they made a mistake. http://reviews.llvm.org/D18035 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
