arichardson added a comment.

In D103835#2999731 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103835#2999731>, @yaxunl wrote:

> In D103835#2999545 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103835#2999545>, @arichardson 
> wrote:
>
>> Merging this change broke our out-of-tree CHERI targets (and Arm Morello). 
>> We use addrspace(200) for *all* globals (including vtables). It would have 
>> been nice if I had been added to this review considering that I added line 
>> you are changing here.
>>
>> If vtables are not in the default globals address space, I think we need 
>> another way of expressing this. I think 
>> `CGM.getContext().getTargetAddressSpace(LangAS::Default))` should also be 
>> correct for your use-case?
>
> vtbl addr space should be the same as `this` pointer. If I use addr space of 
> `this` pointer and not assuming it is default addr space, will it work for 
> you? Thanks.

Yes that would also work. Thanks!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D103835/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D103835

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to