ASDenysPetrov added a comment. In D110625#3035616 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110625#3035616>, @steakhal wrote:
> 'using' is the same as 'typedef' AFAIK. > So, you could simply use only typedefs and implement the test in the c test > file. Seeing all the tests close together would aid readability IMO. You're right. I'm OK with `typedef`. > WDYT Denys? Btw does the SVval::getType return a canonical type in all cases? `SVval::getType` returns a `QualType` which can be aliased and cv-qualified. So, I may mismatch in comparison `BT->getPointeeType() == elementType`. That is my concern. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D110625/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D110625 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
