ASDenysPetrov added a comment. In D110625#3035929 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110625#3035929>, @steakhal wrote:
> I thought that `SVal::getType` should return an already canonical `QualType`. > If it doesn't do that we would need to do canonicalization at each callsite, > which is less than ideal IMO. > If it's not yet canonical, we should probably canonicalize within the > `getType()` function probably. WDYT? I believe that it returns non-canonical type. Yes, we shall get canonical versions separately for most cases in practice. This is not ideal but it would be worse to return canonical types at once along with loss of extra information. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D110625/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D110625 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
