paulkirth added a comment. MisExpect was originally intended to be quite strict, so that developers would audit their code and re-evaluate the correctness of their annotations,or if they were needed at all.
I think I'm still of a mind that getting flagged by MisExpect indicates that a different annotation would be more beneficial, such as `llvm.expect.with.probability`. Regardless, I agree its good to give users an option to relax the checking when they want to, so I will add an option that allows them to specify a scaling factor for the threshold. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
