rjmccall added a comment. In D113107#3606107 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107#3606107>, @zahiraam wrote:
> For this test case: > _Float16 add_half_cr(_Float16 a, _Float16 b) { > > return a > b ? a : b; > > } > > are we expecting the phi node to be > > cond.true: > > %2 = load float , ptr > ... > > cond.false: > > %3 = load float, ptr > ... > > %cond = phi float {{.*}} {{.*}} > > ? I would say no, but if you add a promotable operation outside the `? :`, like `(a > b ? a : b) + 1`, then we should emit the ternary as a promoted value, and that should force its operands to be emitted under promotion. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits