zahiraam added a comment. In D113107#3743318 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107#3743318>, @rjmccall wrote:
> Somehow we've taken a huge step back on unpromotion, and I'm worried you're > now doing the exact thing I didn't want us doing and forcing all the > downstream clients to handle the possibility of a promoted result. Okay may be trying to do the optimization that @pengfei was mentioning is too soon to do? Let me backup here and let for the Unary operators do the promote/unpromote back to back and see if that's better. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
