klimek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D21814#478879, @vmiklos wrote:
> As far as I see `tooling::CommonOptionsParser` (in its current form) does not > handle cl::SubCommand instances. Should I fix that or would it be OK to > switch to using `cl::ParseCommandLineOptions` directly in clang-rename? Well, if you switch, you'll lose a lot of what CommonOptionsParser gives you... So I think it's useful to keep it working with CommonOptionsParser. https://reviews.llvm.org/D21814 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
