klimek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D21814#485410, @vmiklos wrote:
> The alternative is to change the `CommonOptionsParser` ctor to take a vector > of `OptionCategory&`, and in that case we can add the -extra-arg-before and > other options to all subcommands, but that means he'll have to adapt all > client code, i.e. all tools in clang-tools-extra that uses > CommonOptionsParser. Is that an acceptable cost? Or did I miss some easier > way? So Subcommand doesn't support having a set of common options? https://reviews.llvm.org/D21814 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
