dblaikie added a comment. In D85802#3859235 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802#3859235>, @leonardchan wrote:
> In D85802#3858760 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802#3858760>, @rjmccall wrote: > >> Does Fuchsia still need this? If those experiments have stabilized, maybe >> we can just remove it. Also, it should probably have been a -cc1 flag in >> the first place. > > We still use this for making gnu-compatible multilibs (that is, multilibs > which use regular itanium vtables): > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/2c7b7eca85c2ccc9b0d5c65169213ce499652f92/clang/cmake/caches/Fuchsia-stage2.cmake#L200 Naive question, but what does it mean to target Fuschia but be gnu-compatible? (how would that be different than using whatever gnu OS (linux, etc) the other code was built for) > AFAICT there doesn't seem to be a way where one can select the C++ ABI > independently of the target platform. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
