mstorsjo added a comment. In D137024#3931488 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137024#3931488>, @mgorny wrote:
> Well, I'm certainly not opposed to making all the paths configurable. > However, I'm not sure if having CMake file accessible one way or another > wouldn't eventually be a necessity. For one thing, I would like to move more > common code from standalone build codepaths of individual projects into a > dedicated CMake file in LLVM (and while I don't want to speak of others, it > seems that there are at least few other people who would like to see > something similar done). I suppose this wouldn't be an outright blocker if > `llvm/cmake/Modules` directory were present but I'm not 100% sure. Isn't this two kinda separate concerns? If I build llvm but only install the executables (no libLLVMSupport.a, no cmake files etc), there's no LLVMConfig.cmake. But if I have the full llvm-project monorepo around, all the cmake helper scripts are available to be found in the monorepo - there's just no LLVMConfig.cmake (which is specific for one build of the llvm tools). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D137024/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D137024 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
