tstellar added a comment. In D143306#4145432 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D143306#4145432>, @MaskRay wrote:
> This is the point. Specifying a driver option to use > libc++/libc++abi/libunwind doesn't magically change `DT_RUNPATH`. This is > exactly the behavior a user wants for a system Clang. > It does make users with a non-system Clang inconvenient but that's the point > that such users should specify rpath by themselves. > openmp should not diverge from libc++/libc++abi/libunwind in this regard. To me this is a really strong argument in favor of this change. Why does libomp need to be different here? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143306/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143306 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
