aaron.ballman added a comment. Will this new printing policy be used in tree?
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/PrettyPrinter.h:143-145 + /// Ignore qualifiers as specified by elaborated type sugar, instead letting + /// the underlying type handle printing the qualifiers. + unsigned IgnoreElaboratedQualifiers : 1; ---------------- The name is somewhat confusing to me, because tag names are also elaborations and those are handled by `SuppressTagKeyword` -- so what is the interaction between those when the user specifies true for `IgnoreElaboratedQualifiers` and false for `SuppressTagKeyword`? ================ Comment at: clang/unittests/AST/TypePrinterTest.cpp:116-119 + ASSERT_TRUE(PrintedTypeMatches(Code, {}, Matcher, // + "a::S<b::Foo>", // + [](PrintingPolicy &Policy) { + Policy.FullyQualifiedName = true; // ---------------- Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149677/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149677 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits